Local Regulatory Experts
Connect with regulatory affairs consultancies specializing in this region.
View More Consultancies in This RegionNovember 3, 2025
Approximately 5 minutes
Medical Device Vigilance Reporting: Mandatory Timelines and Critical Incident Scenarios
Medical Device Vigilance Reporting: Mandatory Timelines and Critical Incident Scenarios
Vigilance reporting for medical devices is not merely regulatory paperwork; it is a critical safeguard designed to protect patients, prevent future harm, and maintain compliance. It allows manufacturers and regulators to spot safety risks before they escalate.
4 Scenarios Demanding Immediate Vigilance Action
Manufacturers are required to notify regulators immediately upon becoming aware of the following critical incidents:
- Serious Injury: An event where a patient or user has suffered permanent harm or life-threatening injury related to the device.
- Death: A fatality that may be directly or indirectly caused by the device or misuse.
- FSCA (Field Safety Corrective Action): Any action taken by the manufacturer to mitigate the risk of death or serious deterioration of health associated with the use of the device (e.g., a recall, mandatory software update, or safety advisory).
- Public Health Threat: A widespread or systemic risk, such as contamination, a batch-specific defect, or a systemic failure that poses an imminent threat to public health.
Initial Reporting Timelines by Jurisdiction
The speed of notification is paramount, and initial reporting deadlines vary strictly by jurisdiction and incident severity:
| Incident Type | 🇪🇺 EU (MDR) | 🇬🇧 UK (MHRA) | 🇺🇸 USA (FDA) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serious Public Health Threat | 2 days | 2 days | N/A (Immediate notification usually expected) |
| Death or Unanticipated Serious Deterioration | 10 days | 10 days | N/A (Often 5 or 30 days depending on context) |
| Other Serious Incidents | 15 days | 15 days | N/A |
| Incomplete Initial Report (follow-up) | N/A | N/A | 30 calendar days |
Note: With the EU-wide EUDAMED module expected to launch as early as 2026, compliance tracking will become more centralized.
Action Plan for Vigilance Compliance
Staying compliant requires embedding vigilance into the core of the Quality Management System (QMS). Key actions include:
- Establish Internal Buffers: Implement internal lead times (e.g., 24 hours) to allow sufficient time for assessment before the regulatory deadline hits.
- QMS Integration: Formally add all regulatory reporting deadlines to the company’s QMS procedures.
- Team Training: Conduct regular training for all teams (sales, clinical, R&D) to ensure they can accurately identify and escalate critical incidents immediately.
- Thorough Analysis: Use robust assessment checklists and conduct thorough Root Cause Analyses (RCA) to prepare the required follow-up documentation.
Related Articles
Approximately 5 minutes
UK Medical Device Registration (MHRA): Compliance, UKCA Marking, and the UK Responsible Person
To sell medical devices in Great Britain, manufacturers must comply with the **UK MDR**, obtain the **UKCA Marking**, and mandatorily register their devices with the **MHRA**. Foreign manufacturers must appoint a **UK Responsible Person (UKRP)** to handle registration and post-market responsibilities on their behalf.
Approximately 5 minutes
UK Medical Device and IVD Registration: The UKCA Transition and UK Responsible Person Requirements
To place devices on the Great Britain market, manufacturers must comply with the UK MDR and register with the MHRA. Foreign manufacturers must appoint a UK Responsible Person (UKRP) and use a UK importer. While the UKCA marking is the new standard, CE-marked devices remain acceptable until up to June 30, 2030, depending on the device's classification.
Approximately 5 minutes
UK Medical Device Registration Process: A 6-Step Guide to MHRA Compliance
Registering a medical device for the UK market involves mandatory compliance with the **MHRA**. This guide outlines the 6 essential steps, from device classification and conformity assessment to appointing a **UK Responsible Person (UKRP)** and final submission via the **DORS** system.
Approximately 5 minutes
Regulatory Alert: EMA Automates ICSR Pharmacovigilance Compliance Monitoring
The EMA has launched an automated compliance program using **EVDAS** to generate monthly reports on **ICSR submission timelines** (7, 15, and 90-day windows). Marketing Authorisation Holders (MAHs) must ensure their **QPPV** details are correct and verify the **EudraVigilance Gateway Date** to avoid late submission penalties.
Approximately 5 minutes
The Regulatory Trilemma: Navigating MDR, AI Act, and GDPR for Medical AI in the EU
Medical AI in the EU faces a "regulatory trilemma" where the **MDR's static framework** conflicts with the **AI Act's dynamic requirements** for continuously learning models. This, coupled with **GDPR data constraints**, slows innovation by forcing AI's self-improvement cycle to stop for repeated evaluation.