Local Regulatory Experts
Connect with regulatory affairs consultancies specializing in this region.
Qualtech Consulting Corporation
Taiwan, China, Japan, Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, Australia, Germany, Korea, Thailand, USA
A specialized medical device consulting firm offering a one-stop solution for complex global regulatory challenges. We offer real-time regulatory and clinical support, local representation, and QMS services across 13 markets, ensuring efficient market entry and compliance.
Registrar Corp
Hampton, Virginia (HQ), Shenzhen, China, London, United Kingdom, Paris, France, Madrid, Spain, Hyderabad, India, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Tel Aviv, Israel, Guatemala City, Guatemala, Cape Town, South Africa
A global FDA compliance firm assisting businesses in the food, medical device, drug, and cosmetic industries with registration, U.S. Agent services, labeling, and regulatory software solutions.
ARQon Pte. Ltd.
Singapore (HQ), Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, Taiwan, Hong Kong, South Korea, Switzerland, USA, Australia, New Zealand, Rwanda, India, Sri Lanka
We are a premier regulatory consultancy firm specializing in medical devices, in-vitro diagnostics (IVD), and pharmaceuticals. Founded in 2014, the company offers a comprehensive suite of services ranging from product development strategy and clinical trials to product registration and post-market surveillance. With a team of experts possessing vast experience in regulatory authorities and industry, we bridge the gap between scientific innovation and regulatory compliance, ensuring patient safety while fostering medical advancement. The company also provides unique business matching services through its ATTOPOLIS platform and training through the International Medical Device School.
MDREX, Medical Device, Digital Health Consulting Group
Seoul, Republic of Korea (HQ), Japan Office
We offer total solutions for market entry in South Korea and global expansion (e.g., Japan, USA, Europe). Key areas include product approval, reimbursement listings (HIRA), and Quality System certification (KGMP). They are particularly strong in innovative products like SaMD, medical wearables, and 3D printing for medical use, and provide in-depth expertise in cybersecurity and clinical trial planning.
March 10, 2025
Approximately 5 minutes
Standards of Medical Device Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) in South Korea (MFDS Notice No. 2023-31)
Standards of Medical Device Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) in South Korea (MFDS Notice No. 2023-31)
1. What this regulation is and why it matters
South Korea regulates medical device manufacturing quality through Medical Device Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) requirements (often referred to in practice as K-GMP). MFDS Notice No. 2023-31 sets out detailed rules on:
- the scope of devices and regulated parties,
- types of GMP audits (e.g., initial, periodic, renewal, additional),
- how audits are conducted (document review vs. on-site),
- timelines for review and notification, and
- governance of GMP audit agencies and quality-manager training organizations.
Source: MFDS—Amendment Notice No. 2023-31 (May 12, 2023)
Source: Attached PDF—Standards of Medical Device GMP (No. 2023-31)
(For the MFDS English regulations index page, see: MFDS—Medical Device Regulations (English).)
2. Legal basis, purpose, and scope
Legal basis and purpose
The Notice implements the GMP audit and standards framework under the Medical Device Act and its Enforcement Rule, prescribing matters necessary for:
- the manufacturing and quality control standards for medical devices, and
- the conduct of GMP audits and related administration.
Source: Attached PDF—Article 1 (Purpose)
Who it applies to
The Notice applies to medical devices as defined by law. It also clarifies that:
- devices intended only for export, and Class I medical devices, must comply with the standard except for the GMP audit requirement.
Source: Attached PDF—Article 3 (Scope)
Effective date
The Notice states it took effect on November 13, 2023.
Source: Attached PDF—Addenda
3. Key concepts and regulated organizations
GMP audit agencies (quality management audit agencies)
MFDS designates and manages quality management audit agencies (i.e., organizations that conduct GMP audits). The Notice provides requirements such as:
- criteria and procedure for designation, and
- obligations for independent audits and post-management.
Source: Attached PDF—Articles 7 & 12
Quality-manager training organizations
The Notice also sets out requirements for organizations that provide education and training for medical device quality managers, including conditions for designation and compliance.
Source: Attached PDF—Article 8
4. Classification of GMP audits
The regulation classifies GMP audits into (at least) the following types:
- Initial audit (for first-time GMP suitability recognition)
- Periodic audit (performed at least once every three years)
- Renewal (re-recognition) audit
- Additional audit
- Modification audit
The Notice also provides specific cases where a periodic audit may be exempted, including certain export-only or Class I devices, certain investigational medical devices, and certain combination/converged products.
Source: Attached PDF—Article 4 (Classification)
5. How GMP audits are performed
Baseline: follow the audit standards (Annex 2)
GMP audits are conducted in accordance with the audit standards in Annex 2. For investigational medical devices (for clinical trials), the Notice allows partial submission when applying for certain audits.
Source: Attached PDF—Article 5 (Audit Application)
On-site vs. document review
As a general rule, the initial audit includes an on-site audit at least once for each of the applicable manufacturing sites. However, for 64 specified product groups (Annex 4), the initial audit may be conducted as a document-only review (“independent audit”)—and a temporary GMP certificate can be issued in those cases.
Source: Attached PDF—Article 6 (Audit methods) & Annex 4
6. Submission package and review process
What you submit
To apply for GMP suitability recognition, the applicant submits:
- an application form (Annexed form), and
- supporting documents such as a quality manual, SOPs, records, and other evidence that the QMS is implemented as required.
The Notice also provides supplementation procedures if the submission is incomplete.
Source: Attached PDF—Article 5 & supplementation
Processing timelines (key operational deadlines)
Operationally important deadlines include:
- the audit agency notifies the applicant of the result within 30 days after receiving complete application materials; and
- if an on-site audit is required, the agency decides whether to conduct it within 10 days after completing the document review, and then notifies the final result within 30 days after the on-site audit is completed.
Source: Attached PDF—Article 9 (Processing timelines)
7. Certificates: validity, reissuance, and return
Validity
A GMP certificate is issued with a validity period of 3 years.
Source: Attached PDF—Article 8(9)
Reissuance and return
The Notice describes cases where a GMP certificate may be reissued (e.g., change of name/representative/address) and when a certificate must be returned (e.g., upon expiration, cancellation, or invalidation).
Source: Attached PDF—Article 10 (Reissuance) & Article 11 (Return)
8. Practical compliance checklist (for manufacturers/importers)
- Map your product group: confirm whether your product falls into the Annex 4 group eligible for document-only review; if not, plan for an on-site audit.
- Align your QMS evidence: ensure your quality manual, SOPs, and records demonstrate consistent control of production, process validation (as applicable), and CAPA.
- Plan for timelines: treat the 10-day/30-day decision and notification windows as baseline operational expectations when planning market entry.
- Maintain readiness for periodic audits: periodic audits occur at least every three years (unless exempted).
Primary legal text reference: Korean Law Information Center—Medical Devices Manufacturing and Quality Control Standards
Have a Question?
Ask our experts about this topic. We'll do our best to respond to your question.
Related Articles
Approximately 5 minutes
Approval Process for Medical Devices in South Korea (MFDS Overview)
An MFDS overview of South Korea’s premarket pathways (notification, certification, approval), the required technical documentation (including SER when clinical trial reports are needed), review timelines, business licensing for manufacturers/importers, and tracking-control obligations for high-risk devices.
Approximately 5 minutes
Guiding Principles for Conducting Clinical Trials for Machine Learning-enabled Medical Devices (MLMD) in South Korea (MFDS–HSA)
MFDS (Korea) and HSA (Singapore) jointly issued guiding principles (first released Dec 11, 2024) to address MLMD-specific clinical study challenges, covering trial design, dataset representativeness and independence, reference standards and adjudication, and endpoint analysis with justified acceptance criteria.
Approximately 5 minutes
Regulations on Unique Device Identification (UDI) Management in South Korea (MFDS Notice No. 2019-46)
A practical summary of South Korea’s MFDS UDI Management Regulations: what manufacturers/importers must register in the UDI system (UDI-DI, barcode standard, product and company data), optional fields, exemptions, how and when to register updates, confidentiality, and the phased enforcement timeline by device class.
Approximately 5 minutes
Guidance for Additional Considerations to Support Conformity Assessment of In Vitro Companion Diagnostic Medical Devices in South Korea
This guidance explains how South Korea expects in vitro companion diagnostics (IVD-CDx) to be developed, labelled, and supported with analytical and clinical performance evidence for conformity assessment—including scenarios such as follow-on tests, new specimen types, and class/group labelling.