ElendiLabs Logo
Back to Articles

Need Regulatory Help? Try Our Platform

Post your regulatory questions or request quotations from verified pharmaceutical consultants worldwide. Get matched with experts who specialize in your market.

Registration

January 25, 2026

Approximately 5 minutes

Slovakia Act No. 362/2011 §124b(6): Joint Liability of Authorized Representative for Defective Medical Devices

Slovakia Act No. 362/2011 §124b(6): Joint Liability of Authorized Representative for Defective Medical Devices

Paragraph 124b(6) provides: The authorized representative shall be jointly and severally liable with the manufacturer for damage caused by a medical device that is defective within the meaning of the special regulation on liability for damage caused by a defective product, if the manufacturer is not established in a Member State of the European Union. Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

2. Trigger Conditions for Liability

Joint liability arises when all are met:

  • Medical device placed on Slovak market by non-EU manufacturer
  • Device qualifies as defective under Product Liability Act (transposing Directive 85/374/EEC)
  • Damage (death, personal injury, property damage > threshold) occurs
  • Authorized representative is established in Slovakia

Defect defined as lack of safety reasonably expected, considering presentation, use, marketing time. Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

3. Nature of Joint and Several Liability

  • Injured person can claim full compensation from AR alone, manufacturer alone, or both
  • AR pays, then seeks recourse from manufacturer
  • Strict liability — no need to prove fault/negligence
  • Does not limit manufacturer’s primary liability

Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

4. Covered Damages

Liability covers:

  • Death or personal injury
  • Damage to property (private use, above statutory threshold)
  • Economic loss directly linked to personal injury/property damage

Moral/non-pecuniary damages may be claimed under general civil rules. Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

5. MDR Transition Impact

Legacy devices under MDD transitional period (MDR Article 120):

  • §124b(6) joint liability applies until MDD certificate expiry
  • Post-transition, MDR Article 10(16) continues equivalent AR joint liability for non-EU manufacturers
  • Exposure persists for devices placed before full MDR application

Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

6. RA Manager Practical Considerations

  • Secure product liability insurance specifically covering AR exposure
  • Negotiate comprehensive indemnity and hold-harmless clauses in AR agreement
  • Maintain detailed conformity, risk management, and PMS records as defense
  • Implement rapid incident investigation to mitigate defect claims
  • Monitor ŠÚKL vigilance reports for early defect signals
  • Establish claim notification cascade to insurer/legal counsel/manufacturer

Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

7. Typical Claim Triggers

  • Patient injury from alleged inadequate labelling/instructions
  • Device malfunction leading to serious adverse event
  • Widespread defects prompting class/collective claims
  • Recall situations where causation linked to design/manufacturing
  • Claims exceeding manufacturer’s insurance or solvency

Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) practical application (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

8. RA Liability Mitigation Checklist

  • AR agreement includes full recourse/indemnity from manufacturer?
  • Product liability coverage limits sufficient for Slovak claims?
  • Technical documentation complete, current, and AR-accessible?
  • Vigilance/PMS integrated with liability risk monitoring?
  • Slovak-specific IFU/warnings reviewed for adequacy?
  • Claim intake/escalation protocol documented?
  • Historical claims/patterns tracked and analyzed?

Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

9. Claim Procedure in Slovakia

  • Claims governed by Product Liability Act and Civil Code
  • Filed in Slovak courts (usually claimant’s residence)
  • ŠÚKL may provide vigilance/market surveillance evidence
  • Limitation: 3 years from awareness of damage, max 10 years from placement
  • Courts may apportion if multiple liable parties

Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

10. Alignment with MDR Liability Rules

§124b(6) mirrors MDD-era joint liability; MDR Article 10(16) retains:

  • Joint and several liability for non-EU manufacturers via AR
  • Strict liability standard
  • Consistency with EU Product Liability Directive

ARs should maintain robust risk transfer and insurance strategies. Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

Ask Anything

We'll follow up with you personally.

100% response rate • Reply within 7 business days

Your email will not be published. We'll only use it to notify you when we respond.

Need Expert Guidance?

Contact us at contact@elendilabs.com / +852 4416 5550